Previous Page  120 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 120 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

the merger or acquisition in question being subject to authorization

(provided that the turnover thresholds stipulated by the Communiqué

are exceeded), and being examined within the same competitive con-

cerns and effects.

Anti-Competitive Effects and Concerns

The mergers and acquisitions concluded between competitors are

evaluated within the framework provided by the Guidelines on the

Assessment of Horizontal Mergers and Acquisitions (“Guidelines II”).

The evaluation stipulated by Art. 9 of the Guidelines II is twofold:

defining the relevant product and geographical market, and assessing

the effects of the merger or acquisition on competition.

Situations that may create anti-competitive concerns are the cre-

ation and strengthening of a dominant position, and the prevention of

competition through coordination between undertakings. The creation

of a dominant position causes unilateral anti-competitive effects and

concerns. The reduction of competitive pressure by a merger through

creating market power is a unilateral anti-competitive effect. The com-

petitive dynamics may be altered due to market shares, whether the

undertakings are in competition or not, the substitutability of products

specifically in markets of differentiated products, the likelihood of cus-

tomers to change their providers, the barriers to growth, and the taking

part in a merger of an undertaking that can create competitive pressure.

Another anti-competitive effect may be caused by coordinating

undertakings. In this regard, keeping the prices above the competitive

level is given as example to a most likely coordination by the Guidelines

II. Undertakings may also coordinate the dividing of the market, or for

limiting production.

In accordance with the Regulation, the coordination between

undertakings is taken into consideration even when minority share

transfers that do not create control are in question; more specifically,

the level of influence of the minority shareholders - for instance, their

power to appoint management, and their access to classified informa-

tion of the undertaking

1

.

104

NEWSLETTER 2015

1

M. Selim Ünal

,

Sanayi İktisadı ve Rekabet Hukuku Açısından Rakipler Arası Azınlık Hisse

Devirler,

Series of Expert Thesis No: 93.