Previous Page  57 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

NEWSLETTER 2013

44

that that owner of an enterprise can use the trade name for an enterprise

to be established later if the transfer agreement allows it and there is no

non-compete clause. Art. 135/4 TRR sets forth a detailed regulation for

registration in cases where the trade name is subject to the transfer or not

subject to the transfer; so it supports this argument too.

Pursuant to art. 11/3 TTC, the enterprise value is included in the

transfer agreement unless otherwise agreed. The enterprise value is

defined in the preamble as a value exceeding the sum of the individual

elements of the enterprise including the customer portfolio. Therefore,

because the enterprise value is transferred to the transferee, it should

be acknowledged that the transferor is obliged not to compete with the

transferee, even if the parties have agreed on the non-compete clause.

The Problem with the Transfer of Liabilities.

In accordance with the

provision under the Former CO, the assets and liabilities of a commercial

enterprise must be transferred together. Art. 202 TCO is a repetition of

the abovementioned provision. Therefore, it may be assumed that the

explanations given for the Former CO will also be valid for the TCO.

The doctrine defends that a commercial enterprise demonstrates integrity

and thus assets and liabilities must be transferred together; the law-

maker thereby regards the assets as a natural guarantee of the debts of

the enterprise and accordingly it brought an arrangement as such in order

to protect the creditors. According to the dominant opinion, the entire

transfer of assets and liabilities bears a mandatory nature. However, among

the authors that defend the mandatory nature, there isn’t a consensus on

the consequence of the transfer agreement where the agreement has been

established merely for the transfer of assets.

Within the scope of the TCC, it may be stated that the discussion

on the transfer of assets of a commercial enterprise without including

the liabilities, will continue. Although Art. 133/2, b TRR requires the

stipulation of the elements of the commercial enterprise excluded from

the transfer agreement, these elements must be understood as part of

the assets of the enterprise. For instance, some machines, trademarks

or immovable property may be excluded from the transfer agreement.

Therefore the non-stipulation of any provision regarding the exclusion of

liabilities under the TCC and TRR is a significant deficiency..