Previous Page  432 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 432 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS

419

benefited from the block exemption under the Communiqué no

2002/2. (11.04.2013, 13-21/282-133)

• The Board decided that the notified Distribution Agreement

concluded between Roche Müstahzarları Sanayi A.Ş. and Drogsan

İlaçları San. ve Tic. A.Ş. benefited from the block exemption

under the Communiqué no 2002/2. (11.04.2013, 13-21/288-138)

• The Board granted a certificate of negative clearance to the

“Advertisement Agreement” signed between Merck Sharp Dohme

İlaçları Ltd. Şti. and Roche Müstahzarları San. A.Ş. pursuant to

Article 8 of Law No. 4054. (06.05.2013, 13-25/342-159)

• As a result of the examination conducted in response to the

request for the grant of an indefinite individual exemption to

the ATM Bank Card Share Platform Protocol concluded for the

purpose of opening the ATM networks to the services of cash

withdrawal and inquiring the balance of the customers of other

banks through their bank cards, the Board decided that the ATM

Bank Card Share Platform Protocol is within the scope of Article

4 of Act No. 4054; however, an individual exemption could be

granted to the aforementioned agreement since it fulfilled all of

the conditions stipulated under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of Act No.

4054. (06.05.2013, 13-25/347-163)

• As a result of the examination conducted in response to the request

for the grant of an individual exemption to the agreement on the

granting of exclusive authority to Biovesta İlaçları Ltd. Şti. for the

distribution, marketing, sale and promotion of certain medicine

owned by Abdi İbrahim İlaç San. ve Tic. A.Ş., the Board decided

that a certificate of negative clearance could not be granted to the

agreement, dated 23.1.2013, which granted exclusive authority to

Biovesta İlaçları Ltd. Şti. for the distribution, marketing, sale and

promotion of certain medicine owned by Abdi İbrahim İlaç San.

ve Tic. A.Ş, and that said agreement could not benefit from the

block exemption granted by the “Block Exemption Communiqué

on Vertical Agreements, No: 2002/2” since the agreement is signed

between competitors; however, an individual exemption could be