Previous Page  262 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 262 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

249

Unjust Enrichment under the Turkish Code of Obligations

1

*

Att. Pelin Baydar

Introduction

Unjust enrichment is regulated under Articles 77-82 of the Turkish

Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). In the TCO, unjust enrichment

is regulated as a third source of obligation along with agreements and

torts.

As per Article 77 of the TCO, anyone who is enriched unjustly from

someone else’s property or services is obliged to restitute this enrichment.

In order to mention the occurrence of an unjust enrichment, there must

first of all be enrichment in the property of a person (enrichment). On the

other hand, there must also be a decrease in the property value of another

person (impoverishment) and there must be a causal link between such

enrichment and impoverishment.

Enrichment in the property of a person obtained against the benefit

of another person does not always result in the obligation of restitution,

even where there is a causal link. The obligation of restitution arising

from unjust enrichment in the increase of a person’s property value must

rely on “lack of a legal ground”.

Pursuant to Article 77 of the TCO, the obligation of restitution arises

where enrichment especially relies on an (i) invalid, (ii) unrealized or (iii)

terminated cause.

It should be understood that, as per the law, unjust enrichment creates

a relationship of obligation between the enriched and impoverished

person, and the subject of this obligation is the restitution of enrichment

in property value. The offer of restitution relies on a relative claim right

arising from a debt relationship. Thus, the claim of restitution may only

be addressed to the enriched person and all of his successors.

*

Article of May 2013