Previous Page  268 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 268 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

255

the adaptation unless he proves his non-negligence related to the default.

TCO art. 138 does not clearly specify the rights of the obligor in relation

to default, however the obligor, who proves non-negligence in the event of

default should be able to require the adaptation of the contract according

to the teleological interpretation of this article

8

.

Performance Must Have Become Excessively Burdensome for the

Obligor Because of the Unexpected Event in Light of the Principle

of Good Faith

The change must have effect on the essential points of the contract and

disturb the equilibrium of risks and benefits in the period between the date

of the performance of the contract and when the contract was entered into.

The performance of the contract must become sufficiently onerous and

excessively burdensome in the light of CC art. 2. If the excessive burden

already exists before the contract was entered into and was unnoticed only

by the obligor, the contract cannot be adapted pursuant to TCO art. 138. In

such a case, TCO art. 30 et seq. shall be applied to the contract.

Obligor Must Perform His Obligation by Reserving the Right of

Hardship or the Obligor Must Not Yet Perform the Contract

Reserving the right of hardship during the performance of the contract is

only possible where performance is partial; otherwise the full performance

would void the right to claim hardship and adaptation of the contract would

not be possible. In such a case, if an unexpected event occurs after the

partial performance, only the non-performed part will be adapted.

Rights of the Obligor

TCO art.138 provides the obligor two remedies where all the required

conditions of hardship are met:

The Adaptation of the Contract in Accordance with the Changed

Circumstances May Be Requested

The obligor may request the adaptation only before the court. The

obligor may first request the adaptation of the contract from the court,

8 

Öz, Turgut

: Law of Obligations General Provisions Volume-1, Vedat, Istanbul, 2011, p. 211-

212.