Previous Page  194 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 194 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

ARBITRATION LAW

181

Geneva, the existence or the validity of an arbitration agreement will be

examined under the law towhich the parties have subjected their arbitration

agreement. Failing any indication thereon, it shall be examined under the

law of the country in which the award is to be rendered or where, at the

time when the question is raised in court and the country in which the

award is to be rendered cannot be determined, under the competent law

by virtue of the rules of conflict of the court seized of the dispute.

Therefore, in order to determine the applicable law to the substance

of an arbitration agreement, it is important to find out at which point

such a question would arise. Yet, claims related to the substance of the

arbitration agreement may be asserted before the arbitral tribunal or

before the national courts at different stages, which will be explained

below.

Assertion of Invalidity of an Arbitration Agreement before an

Arbitral Tribunal

Claims of invalidity regarding the substance of an arbitration

agreement can be asserted before an arbitral tribunal. In such a case, the

arbitrators shall first examine the invalidity of the arbitration agreement

by taking into consideration the parties’ consent. However, the main

problem occurs in cases when there is no choice of law.

Arbitrators determine the applicable law to the substance of an

arbitration agreement by taking into consideration different criteria. It is

observed that arbitrators use the law of the place of arbitration, the law

applicable to the substance of the principal contract and the arbitration

rules of the chosen arbitral institution as criteria

3

.

In this regard, it might be useful to determine the law of the place

of arbitration as the law applicable to the substance of the arbitration

agreement in order to shield the arbitral award from annulment requests.

Such a choice would also be coherent with the arbitrators’ obligation

of maximum effort to facilitate the execution of arbitral awards, since

annulment of an arbitral award on the grounds of contradiction to the

law of place of arbitration can be avoided if the validity of the arbitration

agreement is subject to that law.

3 

Ozel, Sibel,

“Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Kanunlar İhtilafı Meseleleri”, Legal publications,

December 2008, p. 84.