Previous Page  294 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 294 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

in force since July 1, 2012 stipulates that the parties may freely deter-

mine interest rates for business transactions.

Legal Problem

In this case, it is seen that the usury limitations set forth under

TCO and the freedom for determination of the interest rates for busi-

ness transactions stipulated by art. 8/1 of the TCC contradict.

Consequently, the problem is to examine whether the limitations set

forth under TCO shall be applied to business transactions despite the

provision of art. 8/1 of the TCC. In other words, may the interest rates

for business transactions be freely determined despite the provision of

TCO? Another provision complicating the problem is art. 9 of the

TCC. This article stipulates application of relevant legislation to legal,

capital and default interests. Since the provisions of TCO are also a

part of the legislation on interests, it is possible to defend that the inter-

est rates limitations shall be applied to business transactions.

This legal problem arises from the fact that the TCO does not

include any specification regarding the scope of application of the rel-

evant provisions from the point of persons and this problem is dis-

cussed in the doctrine

2

. According to an opinion

3

, the TCO does not

make any difference between the persons within the scope of applica-

tion of the article such as merchants or non-merchants. The TCO pro-

visions regarding interest rate limitations aim not only to protect the

non-merchants but also the merchants because the excessive interest

rates practices which is effective for the occurrence of the idea to limit

the contractual interest rates caused negative effects also over the mer-

chants. As a result, it must be accepted that the limitations for interest

rates shall be applied also to the merchants.

According to other opinion

4

, the relevant TCC provisions have the

nature as “specific provision” which entered into force on the same

280

NEWSLETTER 2012

2

Legal Hukuk Dergisi, September 2005, Year: 3 No: 34, p. 3641;

AYDOGDU, Murat

, 6098

Sayili Turk Borclar Kanununda Faiz ile İlgili Duzenlemeler, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Dergisi,

2010, Tome 12, N. 1, p. 95;

OGUZMAN, Kemal/OZ, Turgut

, Borclar Hukuku, Istanbul 2011,

p. 523;

ARKAN, Sabih

, Ticari Isletme Hukuku, Ankara 2011, p. 77 vd.

3

AYDOGDU

, p. 95.

4

OGUZMAN/OZ

, p. 523.