Previous Page  31 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

COMMERCIAL LAW

17

votes, liquidation shares, and certain rights

in rem

to be represented on

the BoD. The aforesaid possibility was not regulated under the TCC, but

recognized by the precedents of the Court of Appeal. As the ongoing

precedents of the Court of Appeal recognize “the preferential right of

groups”, the New TCC has included these precedents within the scope of

the new code.

The Possibility for Legal Entities to Be Directors

According to the TCC, only real persons are entitled to be directors.

As the legal entities could not be directors, real persons were chosen to

represent legal entities, and these persons held the director title. Pursuant

to the New TCC, legal entities are entitled to be directors themselves.

Therefore, it will be possible to hold legal entities responsible. According

to the TCC, as the director title belongs to the representative of the legal

entity, the legal entities could not be held responsible as directors. This fact

leads to an unjust practice which does not permit financially strong legal

entities to be held responsible. In accordance with the new provisions, as

the director title is bestowed upon the legal entity, responsibility will also

be imposed upon the legal entity. On the other hand, as the legal entity

is not able to attend BoD meetings itself, a real person designated by the

legal entity will attend the meetings.

Board of Directors Meetings

The meeting and resolution quorums of the BoD are set forth in

Article 330 of the TCC. The aforesaid article caused misinterpretations

as it used the expression of

“at least one more than half the number of

members”.

These misinterpretations are eliminated by Article 390 of the

New TCC. The aforesaid article prefers the expression,

“the majority of

the members”

instead of the expression

“at least one more than half the

number of members”.

Therefore, confusions that can arise concerning the

BoDs consisting of an odd number of directors are prevented.

The ambiguity concerning the decisions taken by circulation and

signature of a resolution text among the directors has been eliminated.

Provisions of the TCC remained silent about whether the signatures of

the directors were required to be on the same paper or not. The New TCC