Previous Page  298 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 298 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

NEWSLETTER 2011

284

Recovery for Unjust Preliminary Injunctions

3

*

Att. Alper Uzun

Concept

The preliminary injunction – also known as interim or interlocutory

injunctions - is one of the provisional remedies for the purpose of

preserving the perspective rights of the parties which is subject of a legal

action until the final determination is given and it is regulated in Article

101 of Civil Procedural Code (“CPC”) and Article 389 of the New Civil

Procedural Code (“New CPC”) which shall enter into force on October

1, 2011. The preliminary injunction may be granted upon request of one

of the parties either prior to or following the filing of the action to redress

the pecuniary loss.

The party, making motion for a preliminary injunction is obliged to

provide with a security deposit in order to pay the damages sustained

by the other party or the third parties in case the request for preliminary

injunction is determined to be unjust. In the case that the motion for

preliminary injunction is determined to be made unjustly and therefore the

interim decision is reversed, the enjoined party and the third parties may

claim the harms inflicted on them as a result of wrongfully-issued interim

decision triggered by unjustly made preliminary injunction motion.

The Conditions for Action and Judgment

Despite the fact that the action to recover damages resulting from

unjust preliminary injunction is not clearly expressed in CPC, in practice

the action is being filed on the grounds of Article 110. However, Article

399. of New CPC embodies this action in the Code with a specific

provision.

The text of the article is as follows:

“(1) The party requesting the preliminary injunction shall

be obliged to indemnify the damages resulting from unjust

preliminary injunction in case the preliminary injunction is

*

Article of July 2011