Previous Page  297 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 297 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

283

might arise particularly with regard to compensation cases

where the damage cannot be defined from the beginning, but can

be assessed after an examination. In our legal system, a person

in this position has to face many difficulties. To begin with, he

is asked to file a lawsuit for a debt that he does not have a total

knowledge of, on the other hand, in case it is found out that the

debt is over the claimed amount, the claimant was able to mention

this fact only within the limits of the prohibition of broadening

the claim. However, the right to claim legal remedies should

not aim to approve such limitation and to force an unrealistic

position, but to protect the person whose rights were infringed

or may be infringed to the greatest extent possible. Currently, the

fact that the concept of “efficient legal protection” becomes a

current issue in comparative law and Turkish law necessitate this

protection.”

When the relevant article is examined with its legal ground, it is

possible to reach the following conclusions concerning the application of

the unspecified claim actions:

1. The action for unspecified claim amounts can be filed (i) in cases

where the amount of the claim can only be defined after the

defendant provides information to the court, (ii) in the cases where

the amount of the claim can only be defined after the investigation

stage of the litigation process, (iii) with regards to the claims that

will be defined in accordance with the discretion of the judge, and

only for pecuniary claims.

2. In the cases where the amount of claim is possible to be specified,

an unspecified claim case cannot be filed.

3. The claimant can file an unspecified claim case by specifying the

legal relationship and a minimum amount or value.

4. The prescription period will be interrupted by the unspecified

claim action, contrary to the current practice, and it will not be

possible that the claim which is not defined by the claimant is

subject to prescription.

5. With the unspecified claim action, the judge will no longer be

bound and confined by the claim of the claimant.