Previous Page  249 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 249 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

235

In the same way, the article sets that right along with the landowner

of the structure the persons who have the right of usufruct or occupier

are also held liable for the insufficiencies in the maintenance or owe duty

of care to keep the premises in safe condition. In spite of the fact that

the persons who have the right of usufruct or occupier are held liable

for the insufficiencies in the care of the structure, they are not liable for

the defects in the construction of the structure. The persons, who are

responsible in this matter, have the right of recourse against persons who

are responsible to them.

On the other hand, the article 70 states that where no damage has

been occurred yet, but a danger of damage exists, the person who can

potentially suffer from that damage has the right to ask the owner of the

structure or the construction work to remedy to this situation by taking all

the necessary precautions.

Danger Liability

It is set in the articles 71 and the followings of the Code. The proprietor

of an enterprise, of which exposes a serious amount of danger or themanager

(if it exists) of such an enterprise is respectively liable for the damages

caused by the activities of this enterprise. In this scenario, principally it is

a matter of the existence of an enterprise exposing an imminent danger,

which is of a severe degree. The criterion of an enterprise presenting an

important degree of danger can be found in the article. Taking into account

the materials used, the equipment, considering the fact that even with the

proper care of an expert the enterprise is propitious to the occurrence of

frequent or severe damages, this enterprise is considered to be an enterprise

exposing a serious degree of danger. Even if these kinds of enterprises are

permitted by law to exercise their activities, the people who suffer from

these damages have the right to demand a compensation for their prejudice.

Conclusion

The articles of the Code on the objective liability different from the

ones of the Code of Obligations n° 818 still in force and newly drafted,

carry expanded liability clauses. It is thus possible to affirm that the

arrangements made in this respect are effective to solve the problems

encountered in a daily base and are appropriate.