Previous Page  235 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 235 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

221

The Concept of “General Transaction Terms” and its

Implications under New Code of Obligations

8

*

Att. Berna Aşık Zibel

One of the significant issues introduced by the new Code of

Obligations, numbered 6098 (“NCO”) is the concept of “General

Transaction Terms (“GTT”)” which was not included in the current

Code of Obligations (“CCO”), and reflects the concept of “Terms and

Conditions” widely incorporated in standard form contracts in English

and American Law

The CCO based on “freedom of contract” principle and concept of

“individual contract” drafted as a result of mutual negotiations of the

parties. Individual contract is the contract in which the declarations of

intent such as offer, counter offer, acceptance are achieved as a result

of reciprocal negotiations. However, in present-day, enterprises such as

finance companies, insurance companies or companies that offers goods

and services to consumers use standard form contracts –also known as

adhesion contracts- which are unilaterally and abstractly prepared for

their later utilization in more than one transaction with respect to services

rendered by them.

GTT is a contractual term inserted in these contracts. They also

referred to as “adhesion contracts” or “standard form contracts”.

As to GTT, there is imbalanced relationship between the parties in

favor of one party over the other during the preparation of the agreement;

the terms of the agreement are not negotiated. Mostly, the prices are set

forth based on the tariffs. In such case, the party, who will enter into

an agreement with the related enterprise, has no opportunity other than

accepting or rejecting the text which was prepared unilaterally.

Regulations with respect to GTT may be considered as statutory

intervention to the principle of freedom of contract where unfair

contractual relationship between the contracting parties and the fairness in

the contract is mislaid. In actual case, the parties are usually composed of

*

Article of July 2011