Previous Page  179 / 469 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 469 Next Page
Page Background

COMPETITION LAW

165

The Competition Board Evaluated the Allegations of Abuse of

a Dominant Position Against Fer Mas Oto Ticaret A.Ş. by not

Providing Spare Parts Requested by a Private Service

9

*

Att. Begüm Taner Huntürk

The Parties and the Allegations

The complainant is a private service company providing services

for Ferrari, Maserati, Aston Martin, and Porsche vehicles. Fer Mas Oto

Ticaret A.Ş: (“Fer Mas”) is the sole distributor of Ferrari vehicles and

their spare parts, and is their sole authorized service provider in Turkey.

The complainant alleged that they tried to purchase spare parts for

these brands from Fer Mas, However, their requests were refused by Fer

Mas without any just cause, and this situation caused the complainant

private service to suffer damages which cannot be overcome.

Moreover, the complainant alleged that Fer Mas has infringed the

Competition Act and also the Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical

Agreements and Concerted Practices in the Motor Vehicle Sector

(“Communiqué”).

Relevant Market

The relevant product market was determined to be the “after-sales

spare parts, maintenance, and repair services market of Ferrari and

Maserati vehicles”.

The relevant geographic market was determined to be “Turkey”.

Evaluations

Within the Scope of the Communiqué

The Competition Board states that the Communiqué aims to

prevent the restriction of competition between authorized services and

private services. It is additionally stated that one of the main aims of

the Communiqué is to enable private services to be an alternative source

*

Article of January 2011