Previous Page  277 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 277 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

HEALTH LAW

263

restaurants, coffee houses, cafeterias and the beer houses owned by private

law persons’ which impose an absolute prohibition is found contrary to

articles 13, 17and 18 of the Constitution.” and applied to the Constitutional

Court for annulment of the relevant article of Law no. 4207.

The Council of State applied to the Constitutional Court only for

the phrase “coffee house” of article 3/1-d of Act no 5727 because the

competence of the court for the contention of unconstitutionality is limited

by the interest of the complainant. However, as the annulment grounds are

also valid for the

“undertakings which provide the entertainment service

as the restaurants, cafeterias and the beer houses”

, it will be possible to

apply to the Constitutional Court for annulment of article 3/1-d of Act no.

5727 for actions of nullity brought by the owners of these undertakings or

relevant associations.