Previous Page  26 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

12

Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees

*

The International Chamber of Commerce’s (hereinafter referred to as

the “ICC”) revised Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (hereinafter

referred to as the “URDG”) entered into force on July 1, 2010.

The rules, approved by the ICC in 1991, have as their objective the

balancing of the conflicting interests of applicants, beneficiaries, and

guarantors. In simplifying the drafting of demand guarantees, they serve

as a model for guarantee practice worldwide.

Demand guarantees are irrevocable undertakings, independent of

underlying contracts, issued by a guarantor on the instructions of an

applicant to pay the beneficiary any sum that may be demanded up to a

maximum amount stated in the guarantee. Whereas a documentary credit

assures the exporter of being paid upon the presentation of complying

documentation showing that a shipment was made, a demand guarantee

provides protection to the importer against non-performance, or late or

defective performance, by the exporter.

In recent years, the URDG have gained increasing worldwide

acceptance. They were adopted by the International Federation of

Consulting Engineers (hereinafter referred to as the “FIDIC”) in their

model guarantee forms and later by the World Bank. National lawmakers

have taken the URDG as a model for independent guarantee statutes.

The revision, formally called URDG 758, replaces URDG 458 and

was agreed to after a two-and-a-half year revision process that produced

five comprehensive drafts based on 600 comments from 52 countries.

The revised rules contain new definitions and interpretation rules

to provide greater clarity and precision, as well as the solution to non-

documentary conditions, asymmetrical guarantees, and counter-guarantees.

In this brief study, URDG 758 will be compared to URDG 458 as to

four points chosen from the contractors’ point of view.

1. InURDG458, there is a risk of contradiction between the description

of the beneficiary in the description part and the definition of

“demand guarantee” in the definitions part (Article 2(a) of URDG

458). The description of the beneficiary in the introduction part

*

Article of April 2010