Previous Page  32 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

18

it contains two undertakings: one is to the beneficiary, the other to the

nominated bank. The two are independent of each other.

Advising bank has an obligation to accurately advise the terms and

conditions of the credit received

This is the result of standard letter of credit practice, and it is consistent

with sub-rule 2.05(a) (ii) of ISP98 and 5-107(c) of the revised UCC.

The nominated bank is allowed to prepay or purchase its promised

undertaking

UCP600 adds a stipulation that,

“a nomination by an issuing bank for a

nominated bank to accept a draft or incur a deferred payment undertaking

includes an authorization for the nominated bank to prepay or purchase a

draft accepted or a deferred payment undertaking incurred by the nominated

bank.”

Such wording was added to clarify the obstruction brought by the

cases in relation to the discounting before maturity. With this revision,

the controversial issue regarding the nominated bank’s prepayment under

acceptance or deferred payment credit is settled under UCP600.

Different addresses of beneficiary and applicant are allowed unless

they are part of consignee information in bills of lading

The use of different addresses for the beneficiary and the applicant has

always been used by the banks as a reason for refusal, although it does not

affect the underlying transaction and the identification of the beneficiary

and the applicant. ICC discourages using such a “minimal” discrepancy as

the basis for refusal, but there are two exceptions mentioned in UCP600.

The first is the indication of a different country from that of the credit, and

the other is indication of different addresses in the consignee or “notify

party” fields on bills of lading. Another point that merits attention is that if

the credit specifically requires indication in a document of the beneficiary

or applicant’s address as stipulated in the credit, the address shown in that

document should be the same as that on the credit.

The requirement for “reasonable time” is replaced with a fixed

period of five banking days

Under UCP500, when the credit lacks agreement both in express

terms and implied terms for determination of the time of refusal, the