Previous Page  150 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 150 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

136

to solve the pending antitrust case. According to the Microsoft’s proposals,

Windows 7 would include Internet Explorer, but the consumers would be

given a free and effective choice of web browser. In parallel, the original

equipment manufacturers would also be able to install competing web

browsers.

The Commission examined Microsoft’s proposals and declared in

June 2009

8

that it would shortly decide on these undertakings consisting

of Windows 7 and the separation of Internet Explorer from Windows.

Meanwhile, Microsoft - in order to satisfy the Commission’s concerns on

the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed undertakings

9

- made

additional proposals on the interoperability between third party products

and Windows and Windows Server.

Commission’s Market Test and Decision

On 9 October 2009, the Commission

10

invited the consumers, software

companies, computer manufacturers, and other interested parties to make

their comments on the proposals of Microsoft to provide present and

future users of the Windows PC operating system a greater choice of web

browsers.

On 16 December 2009, the Commission made the above-stated

proposals binding upon Microsoft. The Commission stated in its decision

11

that in view of the commitments made binding upon Microsoft, there

were no longer grounds for action by the Commission. The Commission

stipulated that the decision would be binding on Microsoft for five years

from the date of adoption.

The Commission is allowed to review Microsoft’s commitments in

two years, and Microsoft is required to report regularly to the Commission

on the implementation of the commitments.

8 For further information, please also see MEMO/09/272 of the Commission.

9 The Commission considered - at first sight - that the proposed commitments would not neces-

sarily have achieved greater consumer choice in practice and would not be considered as effec-

tive remedies.

10 Notice published pursuant to Article 27(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in Case

COMP/C-3/39.530 — Microsoft (Tying).

11 Commission Decision of 16 December 2009 (Case Comp/C-3/39.530 – Microsoft (Tying)).

For further information please see. Article titled “Commission accepts Microsoft’s commit-

ments to prevent eventual abuse of its dominant position” published in our Law Journal of

December 2009.