Previous Page  274 / 522 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 274 / 522 Next Page
Page Background

falls onto a car due to a defect in the window’s frame while an

employee of a cleaning company is cleaning the window, the

cleaning company shall be liable in accordance with the provi-

sions governing the employer’s liability (TCOArt. 66; aCOArt.

55), while the building owner shall be liable in accordance with

the provisions governing the building owner’s liability (TCO

Art. 69; aCO Art. 58).

• Along with the liability arising from tort law, contractual liabil-

ity may be in question. To further explain, in the event that (A)

has an accident with a car rented from (B), and another driver

(C), is also faulty in the occurrence of the car accident, (A) shall

be liable towards (B) on contractual grounds, whereas (C) shall

be liable pursuant to the provisions of the Highway Traffic

Laws.

The Provisions of aCO Governing the Liability of More than

One Person from the Same Damage

This issue was regulated under aCO Art(s). 51 and 52. The said

provisions set forth two differing collective responsibilities, and a dif-

ferentiation is made between “partial solidarity” and “absolute solidarity.”

Accordingly, commitment of a tortious act by more than one per-

son –for instance, a robbery committed collectively by three people-

was identified as absolute solidarity; whereas, the responsibility of

more than one person – as explained, above– on multiple (different)

legal grounds, is classified as partial solidarity. The practical conse-

quences of this division were as follows;

• In instances of absolute solidarity, interruption of prescription

for one liable person meant the same for the others. In cases

where the liable persons were in partial solidarity, this was not

accepted. In other words, even though the prescription was

interrupted for one of the liable persons, it was accepted to con-

tinue for others.

• In absolute solidarity, one of the liable persons used to be the

successor of the creditor insomuch as he/she fulfil his/her oblig-

ations towards the creditor, which is not possible in partial sol-

idarity cases.

258

NEWSLETTER 2015