Previous Page  57 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

dance with subparagraph (d) of Art. 465/1 TCC. Since this situation

would affect the capital participation rate of the current shareholders (it

would decrease their participation rate) the law maker, in order to not

injure the interests of the shareholders, establishes the condition that

the newly issued debt instruments made up of conversion and purchase

rights shall primarily be offered to the shareholders pro rata to their

shares. On the other hand, the “right to be the object of the offer” rec-

ognized for the shareholders may be abolished or restricted in the pres-

ence of just causes

6

. In case the purchase right is recognized for the

employees, it is not required to recognize the right to be the object of

the offer for them. However, in this case, the rights of the shareholders,

whose right of first refusal is restricted, shall be protected within Art.

466/3 TCC.

Protection of Conversion and Purchase Rights Holders

The lawmaker places importance on the protection of persons enti-

tled to conversion and purchase rights in conditional capital increase in

accordance with Art. 467 TCC. In compliance with the first paragraph

of Art. 467 TCC, creditors or employees entitled to acquire registered

shares through conversion or purchase rights may not be prevented

from exercising these rights based on the claim that the transfer of such

shares is restricted, unless such a restriction is explicitly stipulated

under the articles of association or in the offering circular.

Another arrangement protecting rights holders is stipulated in the

second paragraph of the same article. In accordance with said para-

graph it is set forth that conversion or purchase rights recognized for

creditors or the employees may not be subject to any losses due to cap-

ital increase, the granting of new conversion or purchase rights or by

any other means. However, along with said regulation the 2nd para-

graph also stipulates that if the conversion fee is decreased, the rights

holders have been provided with adequate consideration or the share-

holders incur losses in the same manner, an action contrary to the pro-

tection defined in the previous sentence may be carried out.

COMMERCIAL LAW

41

6

KENDİGELEN

, p. 322.