Previous Page  275 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 275 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

fifteen days before the end of the contractual term. On the other hand,

the landlord may not terminate the contract due to expiry of the con-

tractual term. It should be emphasized that this provision corresponds

to Art.11 of abrogated Law No. 6570 on Real-Estate Leases (“Law No.

6570”)

1

.

The novelty of this Article is the right of landlords to terminate a

lease contract without showing any reasonable ground at the end of the

ten-year extension period, provided that the landlord notifies the tenant

at least three months before the end of any extension period.

Previously, landlords were allowed to terminate a lease contract only

in case of events which justified termination and were specified under

the relevant articles of Law No. 6570 and the Code of Obligations No.

818. It is also determined that landlords may terminate a lease contract

that does not have a fixed term in accordance with general provisions

through a termination notice served ten years after the conclusion of

such contract.

The legal justification of this Article, which substantially affects

many lease contracts and which is considerably in favor of landlords,

is the societal disturbance caused by landlords not being able to have

direct possession of the property for long periods. In this respect, when

the conditions of said Article are met, the landlord is able to terminate

a lease contract through a unilateral notification, without the burden of

providing reasonable grounds and without being obliged to compen-

sate the tenant, and he will use the lease himself or make a new contract

with a new tenant after obtaining direct possession of his property.

Postponement of the Effective Date

Provisional Art. 2 of Law No. 6101 sets forth an exception and

provides for a one-time postponement of a landlord’s right to terminate

lease contracts on residential premises and roofed workplaces. The

legal justification for this postponement is to prevent potential damage

to tenants and other potential problems that would be caused by the

immediate application of Art. 347/Par.1.

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

259

1

Cevdet Yavuz

: Borçlar Hukuku Dersleri (Özel Hükümler), İstanbul 2011, p. 288.