Previous Page  248 / 521 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 248 / 521 Next Page
Page Background

because of an infringement of competition law can directly initiate a

claim for damages before the national courts. It will be up to the

claimant to prove that there is an infringement of competition law, and

the national law will govern this infringement.

This issue was subjected to lengthy debate under Turkish law.

Some legal scholars argued that the Competition Authority is the spe-

cialized body to establish competition infringement, and that the

national courts do not have enough experience, knowledge, or suffi-

cient staffing to assess competition infringements. Therefore, any

claim of compensation has to be based on the prior finding of infringe-

ment by the Competition Authority. Other legal scholars advocated in

favor of the power and the role of the national courts in assessing com-

petition infringements. Further to those legal scholars, the courts are

the ultimate body to make this assessment, either directly, or through

acting as review court, of the Competition Authority’s decision.

Therefore, there is no need to await a final decision of the Competition

Authority, which may be long in coming.

The approach of the national courts has substantially diverged on

this question. Some courts have accepted claims for damages without

a prior assessment being provided by the Competition Authority. These

courts have made their own analyses of infringements by using court-

nominated experts, and thus, rendered their decisions. Some other

courts, in the absence of the prior assessment of the Competition

Authority, have suspended the case, and ordered the claimant to apply

to the Competition Authority to establish competition infringement.

Notwithstanding these differences of views, the courts’ practice now

seems to be established in favor to await the assessment of the

Competition Authority, if the claim of compensation is not based on a

decision of the Competition Authority.

Although the practice of the courts differs from what was provid-

ed by the Directive, I am of the opinion that this practice is more reli-

able, since it respects the expertise and knowledge of the Competition

Authority. In many instances, the establishment of the competition

infringement is difficult, and requires particular knowledge and exper-

tise that ordinary courts may not have. In particular, in consideration of

cartels, the hidden nature of a cartel makes it difficult to identify. The

232

NEWSLETTER 2014