Previous Page  157 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 157 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

NEWSLETTER 2013

144

Legal Ground

A specific provision on the protection of competition was included

under Article 16 of Law No. 4046 on the Regulation of Privatization

Applications (“Law No. 4046”)

4

while Communiqué No. 1998/4 was

still in force. Due to this provision, whether or not there was any legal

ground for the application of competition law to privatization through

acquisition was debated. Some academics argued on the basis of the last

sentence of Article 7 of the Act on the Protection of Competition No. 4054

(“Competition Act”) that it enables the issuance of special communiqués

5

.

It states that: “

The Board shall declare, through communiqués to be issued

by it, the types of mergers and acquisitions which have to be notified to

the Board and for which permission has to be obtained, in order for them

to become legally valid”

. As for other academics, they argued that there

was not any legal ground in the Competition Act to issue such special

communiqués

6

.

There is no doubt that the Competition Authority has the power to

issue special communiqués since it has been established with a view

to ensure competition in the relevant market and that Article 7 of the

Competition Act provides legal ground for such power. Communiqué No.

1998/4, which was one of the first special communiqués, was prepared

within this purpose. Furthermore, in 2005, Article 16 of Law No. 4046

was also abrogated

7

.

Why a New Communiqué?

The fundamental purpose of Communiqué No. 2013/2 is to replace

the market share and turnover threshold system established under

Communiqué No. 1998/4 by just the turnover threshold system.

Such amendment was made in order to comply with European Union

Regulations and harmonize Turkish legislation.

4 

See. Art. 2(d) and 16 of the Act No. 4046.

5 

See.

ERDEM, Ercüment

: “Quelques réflexions sur la Loi de la Privatisation”, Prof. Dr. Ali

Bozer’e Armağan, Ankara 1998, p. 708.

6 

See.

ASLAN, Yılmaz

, Rekabet Hukuku, Genişletilmiş 4. Bası, Bursa 2007, p. 606.

7 

The related article has been abrogated pursuant to Art. 11 of the Act dated 3.7.2005 and No.

5398 which was published in the Official Gazette dated 21.7.2005 and numbered 25882.