Previous Page  150 / 473 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 150 / 473 Next Page
Page Background

COMPETITION LAW

137

numbered 07-56/672-209

14

, considered information exchanged

“over a

prolonged period”

as anticompetitive. Nevertheless, the duration of the

information exchange is not stated in the decision, therefore, the Board’s

interpretation on the duration of “prolonged period” is not clarified.

Importance of the Information Exchanged

As has been frequently stated in Board decisions

15

, information

exchange does not constitute

per se

a competition violation since

information exchange does not always influence competition in a

negative way; it may even have positive effects on competition. Indeed, it

is accepted that information exchange has positive effects on competition

if it permits the parties to better organize their future investments.

However, information exchange may be anticompetitive from the

point of view of the market structure and the nature of the information

exchanged.

Influence of the Market Structure.

It may be observed from Board

decisions that market structure can have a significant influence on

information exchange. The Board takes a flexible approach to information

exchange where the market is transparent, since in such a case exchanged

information may also be obtained from the market. For instance, the

Board, in its decision dated 15.04.2004 and numbered 04-26/287-65,

specified that there was low probability that the information exchanged

between the parties caused coordination since the products are uniform

and there are a lot of actors in the market

16

.

Contrary to the aforementioned, the Board has an inflexible approach

to information exchange where the market is not transparent, which means

that the information exchanged between parties may not be obtained from

14 

To reach the decision, see the following link:

http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/default.aspx?nsw=tfjcBAxVih5pUKigR05EaA==-

H7deC+LxBI8=&nm=90 (accessed on: 21.03.2013).

15 

For instance, see the Board decision dated 19.12.2005 and numbered 05-85/1182-336,

http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/default.aspx?nsw=tfjcBAxVih5pUKigR05EaA==-

H7deC+LxBI8=&nm=90 (accessed on: 21.03.2013).

16 

For information about the decision, see the following link:

http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/default.aspx?nsw=tfjcBAxVih5pUKigR05EaA==-

H7deC+LxBI8=&nm=90 (accessed on: 21.03.2013).