470 / 516
the complaint should be rejected and an investigation should
not be initiated. (09.08.2012,12-41/1187-397)
• As a result of the examination conducted in response to the
claim that Metro Grosmarket, utilizing the buyer power it holds,
exposed the applicants, which operate as suppliers to unpre-
dictable commercial risks by demanding payments under various
titles and by introducing a consignment sales condition, thereby
causing material pecuniary losses for the applicants, the Board
decided that the complaint should be rejected and an investiga-
tion should not be initiated. (09.08.2012, 12-41/1178-388)
• As a result of the re-evaluation of the relevant file following the
annulment of the Board decision dated 25.02.2009 and num-
bered 09-08/158-M, which concerned the claim that Esgaz
Eskişehir Şehir Içi Gaz DagitimA.Ş. and Boru Hatlari ile Petrol
Taşima A.Ş. abused their dominant positions by implementing
excessive pricing with the natural gas transportation fees they
collected from the free consumer Eskisehir Chamber of
Industry Organized Industrial Site, by the 13th Chamber of the
Council of State decision dated 06.04.2012 and numbered
2009/2951 E., 2012/601 K., the Board decided that the com-
plaint should be rejected and an investigation should not be ini-
tiated. (09.08.2012, 12-41/1171-384 )
• As a result of the re-evaluation of the relevant file following the
annulment of the Board decision dated 16.10.2008 and num-
bered 08-58/921-368, which concerned the claim that Ankara
Water and Sewerage Administration and Electricity-Gas-Bus
General Directorate (Baskent Dogalgaz Dagitim A.Ş.) deter-
mined which meters could be used by consumers and did not
provide alternatives on the subject to consumers, forcing them
to purchase a specific product by the 13th Chamber of the
Council of State decision dated 06.04.2012 and numbered
2009/701 E., 2012/603 K., the Board decided that the complaint
should be rejected and an investigation should not be initiated.
(09.08.2012, 12-41/1173-385 )
• As a result of the re-evaluation of the relevant file following the
annulment of the Board decision dated 03.07.2008 and num-
456
NEWSLETTER 2012