Previous Page  319 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 319 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

The seller warrants under the representations and warranties of the

share purchase agreement that the purchased enterprise actually pos-

sesses the qualities claimed to be possessed by the enterprise. These

provisions determine the qualities of the enterprise and therefore the

responsibility of the seller; given that any discrepancies between the

declared qualities and the qualities present in the enterprise shall con-

stitute a defect. The buyer is requested to assume certain risks by its

representations and warranties; frequently the representations and war-

ranties include a provision that all information and documents provid-

ed by the seller during the due diligence are accurate and complete and

the seller did not refrain from the provision of any information or doc-

ument.

Conclusion

The seller is obliged to ensure that the good, whose property is

transferred to a buyer under a sale and purchase agreement, does not

possess any defects. If the buyer detects that the sold good has defects

as a result of conducting an examination thereon and notifies such

defect, it may hold the seller responsible from its warranty against

defects. In such a case, the buyer may either request a discount in the

purchase price, or the termination of the agreement or the replacement

of fungible goods. If the buyer purchases the good after conducting an

examination, it will be assumed to have accepted the (evident) defects,

which may be detected as a result of the examination; and consequent-

ly the buyer shall not be held responsible of such defects.

The mergers and acquisitions include the execution of a sale and

purchase agreement. The buyer shall examine the sold company or

enterprise through conducting a due diligence thereon. Therefore, such

a due diligence shall result in the seller not being responsible of defects

that are not hidden defects. On the other hand, if the seller knowingly

and fraudulently hid certain facts as a result of which certain defects

are not identified, the responsibility of the seller with respect to war-

ranty against defects shall continue.

The seller may explicitly warrant that certain evident defects

detected through the due diligence are no longer existent. The sellers

provide an explicit promise that the purchased company or enterprise

LAW OF OBLIGATIONS

305