Previous Page  207 / 516 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 207 / 516 Next Page
Page Background

In order for an arbitration agreement to be valid, it shall be in a

written form. The written form requirement is not a condition of proof

but a condition of validity. Pursuant to article 412/3 of the CPC, the

inclusion of the arbitration agreement in a written executed document

or in an exchange of a communications such as letters, telegrams,

telex, fax or transferred into an electronic environment, or the lack of

objections of a respondent in his petition to the petition of claim of a

claimant claiming the existence of a written arbitration agreement is

sufficient. An arbitration agreement will also be deemed validly exe-

cuted in the event of a reference to a document containing an arbitra-

tion clause, so as to make it part of the main agreement. The claim

about the existence of the arbitration agreement gives flexibility to the

condition of written form.

The arbitration agreement must be executed for specific disputes.

Indeed, it must be agreed to refer disputes arising from a specific legal

relationship to arbitration. For instance, arbitration agreements which

foresee referring all disputes which may arise between two parties to

arbitration shall not be valid.

The principle of validity of the arbitration agreement being inde-

pendent from the validity of the main agreement is accepted by the

CPC as well. Pursuant to the “separability doctrine”, the validity of the

arbitration agreement is independent from the validity of the main

agreement in which they are embedded. Therefore, even if the main

agreement is deemed invalid for any reason, the arbitration agreement

shall continue to be valid and binding. This principle is supported by

Article 412/4 of the CPC. Pursuant to the relevant article, objections to

the arbitration agreement stating that the main agreement is not valid

or that the arbitration agreement is regarding a dispute which has not

yet arisen are inadmissible.

Pursuant to Article 413/1 of the CPC, in the event of initiating a

lawsuit before courts regardless of the existence of a valid arbitration

agreement, the respondent shall put forward the fact that the dispute

shall be resolved through arbitration as an initial objection. Pursuant to

Article 116/1/b of the CPC the objection regarding a dispute which

shall be resolved through arbitration is among the initial objections. In

this context, the objection on arbitration shall not be heard if it has

ARBITRATION LAW

193