Previous Page  40 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

26

Turkish law, some of the jurisdiction rules are related to

ordre public

and

are regulated within the exclusive jurisdiction of Turkish Courts. These

are mainly matters relating to immovable assets, claims within the scope

of the Code of Execution and Bankruptcy, and claims pertaining to the

registration, deregistration, or a cancellation of an intellectual or industrial

property right in Turkey.

Turkish Public Order

A foreign judgment which is obviously against the Turkish

ordre

public

will not be enforced. The determination of when the basic values

of Turkish Law are damaged is within the discretion of the Turkish judge.

Some examples of a contradiction of

ordre public

are violations of the right

to be heard, judgments without merits, judgments against good morals,

and judgments violating foreign trade, customs, or tax regulations.

Respecting the Defendant’s right of defense

A foreign judgment will not be enforced if under the law of the foreign

country, the person against whom the enforcement is sought has not been

properly summoned, was not represented in court, or had a default judgment

rendered against him or her which was contrary to the laws of that country.

Enforcement in these cases will be rejected if the party against whom the

enforcement is sought raises these objections before the Turkish court.

Effects of the Enforcement Decision

Foreign judgments that are enforced by a Turkish court decision are

treated like Turkish local court judgments and can be executed as if they

were Turkish court decisions.

Conclusion

As Turkey is a party to the New York Convention, the recognition and

enforcement of arbitral awards are mostly subject to the Convention.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is regulated in

the IPPL. However, Turkey is a party to various international conventions

and many bilateral agreements concerning this matter. Briefly, the Turkish

courts are not allowed to re-review the merits of the case, and the grounds

for refusal of enforcement are exhaustively listed in the IPPL.