Previous Page  266 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 266 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

NEWS LETTER 2 0 1 0

252

In fact, the damage stated here does not correspond to concrete

damage; it corresponds to the fact that the claimant suffered damage from

an administrative act and that it will be impossible or difficult to indemnify

that damage. Nevertheless, in order for a suspension of execution order to be

given, this possibility is not enough. As a matter of fact, the administrative

act shall also be expressly contrary to law. The situation of contradiction

to law shall not be strictly interpreted. Indeed, not only the legislation,

but also the equality, justice and equity rules shall be taken into account

in their integrity. Courts interpret whether or not there is a possibility of

contradiction to law upon a simple analysis of the initial petitions they

receive without examining the merits of the case.

Another condition is that, in order for a suspension of execution

order to be given, a “ground” shall be given as per Article 27 of the Code

of Administrative Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the “CAP”) and

Paragraph 5 of Article 125 of the Constitution. The condition of existence

or not of the occurrence of damages which are difficult or impossible to

remedy and the express contradiction to law of the administrative act shall

be established with a valid ground. Decisions without a ground are invalid.

Paragraph 5 of Article 27 of the CAP provides that suspension of

execution orders will be given against financial guaranty. The purpose of

the financial guarantee is to cover the administration’s damages caused due

to a suspension of execution and the non-annulment of the administrative

act at the end of the lawsuit. As financial guaranty, money, letters of

guarantee issued by banks, treasury bonds and debentures, national

stocks and bonds to be determined by the government and moveable and

immoveable property provided by the persons concerned or which have

been provided by third parties in favor of the persons concerned and which

have been seized pursuant to an attachment order by the creditor public

administration set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure and in the Law

on the Procedure for the Collection of Public Receivables are accepted.

Financial guarantee is not requested from the administration or a person

who benefits from public legal aid.

Finally, a “situation in which suspension of execution cannot be

requested” shall not exist. As examples to these situations, pursuant to

Article 125/6 of the Constitution, acts not submitted to judicial review and

to which suspension of execution orders may not be given – for instance,

the acts of President of the Republic in his own competence, and the

decisions of the Supreme Military Council, Decisions of the Council of