Previous Page  251 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 251 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

PROCEDURAL LAW

237

Partial Cases

*

In the law of civil procedure, a partial case is suing for a part of a

claim and for some reason reserving the other part of the claim for a later

date in order to amend the reserved rights without filing a new suit. In this

respect, the claimant may demand its reserved rights in the partial case by

amendment of its claim in the same case without filing a new lawsuit.

The reason for a partial case is minimizing the expenses of litigation.

Perhaps a claimant does not want to undertake the expenses of the whole

case in the beginning. By filing the partial case, the claimant can see the

progress of the case without initially undertaking a large fee and may

form its final claim according to this progress. In this way, the claimant

avoid paying high amount of fees and can decide to pay them after being

sure about the outcome of the case. In practice, generally, claimants act

according to the facts in their partial cases (e.g., according to the conclusion

of an expert report) and prefer to amend the claim amount after the expert

report.

The right to bring a partial case was authorized by a Constitutional

Court Decision on July 20, 1999, with the number of 1999/1 E. and 1999/3

K. and published in the Official Gazette dated 04.11.2000 by annulment

of the last sentence of Article 87 of the Code of Civil Procedure which

stated “claimant can not increase the statement of a claim by amendment”.

Before this decision, claimants had to, first, file a suit for a part of

the claim and then later file a new suit for the other part of their claims

and they had to demand the consolidation of the cases. The Constitutional

Court, annulled the relevant article in Code of Civil Procedure on the

grounds that the fact that the article does not give the right to increase the

claim by an amendment, that it force the claimant to file a second lawsuit

and it restricted basic human rights and it was against procedural economy,

the rule of law, and the freedom to seek a remedy.

*

Article of May 2010