Previous Page  139 / 391 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 139 / 391 Next Page
Page Background

COMP ET I T I ON LAW

125

As a justification for its decision, the Board indicated that Mehmet

Kazancı, Esin Kazancı, Begüm Kazancı and Mustafa Kurnaz, shareholders

of MMEKA, are under the same entity as Kazancı Holding A.Ş., and

consequently, as Aksa Elektrik Perakende Satış A.Ş (hereinafter referred

to as “Aksa Elektrik”).

In accordance with the information available to the public, Kazancı

Holding A.Ş., with its publicly held participations in Aksa Elektrik Üretim

A.Ş., Aksa Elektrik Toptan Satış A.Ş. and Aksa Elektrik, appears to hold

a substantial market share in the electricity production and distribution

market. On the other hand, it can be understood, from several decisions of

the Competition Board, that Kazancı Holding A.Ş. also holds a substantial

market share in the natural gas distribution market. As a matter of fact,

the Competition Board, in its decisions of Çoruh Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş.,

Osmangazi Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş, Fırat Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş., Vangölü

Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş., concerning the acquisitions of these undertakings

by Aksa Elektrik, and its decisions of Yeşilırmak Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş.

and Çamlıbel Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş., concerning the acquisition of these

undertakings byAnadoluDoğalgaz DağıtımA.Ş., discussed the fact that the

same undertakings hold an electricity and natural gas distribution within the

same territory in terms of “convergent market integration” and permitted

these acquisitions by majority of votes. Dissident members underlined that,

on one hand, the integration on the convergent markets creates a dominant

position, and on the other hand, the necessary precautions to prevent

the superposition were not taken. Therefore, whether OG, the winning

undertaking, is under the same economic entity as Kazancı Holding A.Ş.

or not, is crucial.

In its Summary Decision, the Competition Board emphasized that the

acquisition of all three of Boğaziçi Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş., Gediz Elektrik

DağıtımA.Ş. and Trakya Elektrik DağıtımA.Ş. by İş-Kaya İnşaat Sanayi ve

Ticaret Ltd. Şti.-MMEKA Makine İthalat Pazarlama ve Ticaret A.Ş. Joint

Venture Group and/or Aksa Elektrik Perakende Satış A.Ş. would result

in creating a dominant position and decreasing competition significantly

in the relevant markets with respect to Kazancı Holding Inc, according to

Article 7 of Act No. 4054. Based on this evaluation, the Board decided

that the acquisition of all three of Boğaziçi Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş., Gediz

Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş. and Trakya Elektrik Dağıtım A.Ş. by İş-Kaya-

MMEKA OG and Aksa Elektrik will not be authorized according to Article