The Constitutional Court Decision Regarding Examination of the Corporate E-mail Account
The Constitutional Court Decision dated 12.01.2021 and numbered 2018/31036 (“Decision”), published in the Official Gazette dated 05.02.2021 and numbered 31386, discusses the examination of the bank employee’s corporate e-mail account by the employer. In the Decision, it is evaluated whether the authority and procedure of this examination has violated the employee’s right to demand protection of personal data and freedom of communication.
In the incident subject to the Decision, the employer terminated the employment contract due to the employee’s violation of the prohibition of working in another job and low performance, and exhibited the e-mail correspondence as an evidence.
The Decision analyzed the elements of the balance of interest that should be established between the management right of the employer and the fundamental rights and freedoms of the employee.
In brief, it is concluded the employee’s fundamental rights and freedoms have not been violated for the following reasons:
- The employment contract bears the provisions informing that the corporate e-mail account shall only be used for business purposes and can be audited by the employer without notice.
- The employee has given approval for the authority and the procedure of auditing.
- The employment contract includes the termination clause, clearly ruling that if the employee does not comply with the determined obligations – such as the use of the corporate e-mail in accordance with its purpose, the detection of low performance and the prohibition of working in another job – the employment contract may be terminated.
- The employer only examined the e-mail content supporting the claim that the employee has been working in another job and only used these contents in the judicial process to prove the claim.
- You may access the full text of the Decision here.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Law on the Amendment of the Law on Social Security and General Health Insurance and the Decree Law No. 375, publicly known as the Law of Victims of Delayed Pension Age (EYT Law) entered into force upon its publication in the Official Gazette dated March 3, 2023 and numbered 32121. With the EYT Law...
The Presidential Decree on the Measures Taken in the Field of Labor and Social Security under the State of Emergency (Decree) entered into force through its publication in the Official Gazette dated 22.02.2023 and numbered 32112. The measures introduced by the Decree and to be implemented in the...
Law No. 7431 on Amendments to the Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Law, Certain Laws and Decree Law No. 375 (Law) was published in the Official Gazette dated January 13, 2023 and numbered 32072. With Article 7 of the Law, temporary Article 43 was added to the Decree Law No. 375 and...
The Constitutional Court (Court) Decision dated 21.09.2022 and with the application number 2019/25604 (Decision) has been published in the Official Gazette dated 15.11.2022 and numbered 32014. The Court ruled that the right to respect to privacy and freedom of communication were violated in...
Through the promulgation of Presidential Decision No. 5806 (“Decision”), published in the Official Gazette dated 21st July 2022 and No. 31899...
Through the Regulation on the Enforcement of International Workforce Law published in the Official Gazette dated 02.02.2022 and numbered 31738, the Regulation on the Enforcement of the Law on Work Permits of Foreigners has been superseded...
Social Security Institution Introduced New Codes for Termination