240 NEWSLETTER 2021 Conclusion The Assembly unified the judgments in line with the views of the Court of Cassation General Assembly of the Civil Chamber and the 12th Civil Chamber. According to the unified judgments, if the notification issued to the last known address of the addressee is returned, and the domicile of the addressee registered at the address registry system is different from this address, it shall be sufficient to directly issue a notification pursuant to Article 21/2 of the NL to the place of residence of the addressee registered at the address registry system with the “CPAS address” annotation. In that case, it is not required to initially issue a normal notification to this address. The Decision sets out that the Assembly adopted the two-step notification system and finalized the debates concerning the three-step notification system.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjUzNjE=